Friday, October 8, 2010
PR: S8E11 Brenda's Blast
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
"I Had to Think Quickly" Pretty Much Says It All !
I didn’t realize that this is a new series and a new genre (Mickey Haller vs. Harry Bosch and something-something vs. thriller) until I trolled around on Amazon.com and read some editorial reviews once I’d finished the book. That being the case, I’m pretty confident I would gladly read another entry in the new Mickey Haller franchise. I’m not sure about the Harry Bosch books, but given how much of a page-turner The Lincoln Lawyer was, I’m reasonably confident I’d probably like anything Michael Connelly cranked out.
I’m aiming to be less wordy these days, so here are my slightly more succinct thoughts:
“I had to think quickly” is the mantra for this guy and he proves it time after time. He’s an on-the-right-side hustler with extremely strong street and legal/tactical skills. I found him immensely appealing.
I like the slight spin on the hard-boiled, ambulance-chaser genre. Mickey is relatively successful at what he does (scoring the occasional “franchise” cases and getting around in the titular Lincoln Continental using one of his more dead-beat ex-clients as his driver). It was also a switch from the usual pattern of ethical-if-rule-bending PI locking heads with a slimeball attorney.
I especially liked the insider info on how the defense system really works—the deals made, the loose and often acrimonious interactions between criminal attorneys (balanced with some unexpected acts of camaraderie), the prosecutors, and the judiciary. It reads as true, although only our Bethie, JD, can really comment on that with any real knowledge.
I also liked the twist of having Haller represent a client who he knew was guilty of not one but a number of murders, including the murder of his close associate and friend, Raul Levin. It is unusual in this genre for a protagonist to be shown doing an effective job representing a client he actively hates and sees as profoundly evil.
I’m not sure exactly what constitutes a “thriller” as opposed to a mystery, but I did find that I had trouble putting this book down—I really wanted to know how it turned out and, unlike the more pragmatic Chairman Ann, I rarely let myself read the end until I actually get there, so I found it difficult to put the book down because I was so strongly engaged in the story line.
I also saw this book as being easily translatable to the cinema. Maybe I’m watching too many Netflix these days—suddenly, EVERYTHING seems like a potential movie to me!
Monday, September 27, 2010
OK, It's Finally Come To This...
So here's this (last?) week's best blog:
____________________________________________________________________
Gasp! No! Tim Gunn may stop posting ‘Project Runway’ vlogs after ‘hurtful reaction’ to Episode 8 video
Tim, your vlogs are a highlight of my week. Don't make me get a real life! I'm not ready!
For the record, I fully support Tim Gunn and his informative, opinionated, hilarious vlogs. I believe he must take his own advice and carry on. But right now it’s not clear if he will.
Obviously Father Tim is an angel that fell from the sky, but even he knows when he’s gone too far — and he may have gone too far last week with the “Project Runway” Season 8 Episode 8 vlog.
(Little did I know my thrown together recap would briefly become the definitive transcript.)
In the vlog, Tim disses last Thursday’s Jackie Kennedy challenge structure and calls out producers by name. Shortly after it was posted, the vlog mysteriously disappeared from Tim’s Facebook fan page.
Tim told the New York Post that the decision to take down the video was completely his own.
“Lifetime had nothing to do with it. I did it completely on my own,” Tim told The Post yesterday. “There was a hurtful reaction to a couple of things I said, and that really concerned me. That was never my intention. I thought, ‘Let me just take this down.’”
Tim’s mouth may be his own Waterloo. Knocking Taylor Momsen and Anna Wintour is fine, but he has to work with these “Project Runway” folks every week, so he really should show a little discretion.
But this is the part that scares me:
Tim says he’s not sure now if he’ll be posting any more “Runway” critiques on his Facebook page.
“I’m debating it,” he said. “I don’t want to hurt anyone, and at the same time I want to be able to talk matter-of-factly. The experience with this episode has been very sobering for me. It’s kind of a wakeup call — you just can’t say anything, yet, at the same time, there are things I want to share. I need to be a little more careful about it, even though we all make mistakes.”
NOOOOOO!
Tim, yes, be more careful and don’t use the producers’ actual names when you’re spouting off on the vlogs, but YOU MUST CARRY ON! You are The Truth about “Project Runway.” The world would crumble into a sluttyslutty/threw him under the bus/looks cheap/hot mess without you and we’d never find Andrae. PLEASE keep posting the vlogs!
Friday, September 24, 2010
PR: S8E9 Brenda's Blast
Thursday, September 23, 2010
PR: S8E8 Brenda's Blast
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Who Knew "Interview" is Also A Verb? New Source for PR Snark Follows! And Tim Gunn Vlog Controversy...
And more earth-shattering news, for those of you who didn't scurry right over to Tim Gunn's vlog earlier this week, in which he soundly chastises (Tim would chastise, not attack, right?) the producers for a royally fucked-up challenge and the judges for continuing their descent into crack-whoredom...it's been mysteriously removed, presumably due to objections by Lifetime TV on his blunt and honest take on how screwed-up the production/creative values of the show have become. Wild speculation on the part of the commentariat that either Tim just WANTS to get fired so he can move on to something more fun (after all, his book hit # 5 on the NYTimes best-seller list in the first week it was out) or that the producers want to severely reign him in or fire him because he speaks -- how you say? truth to power, and that's never a good way to stay gainfully employed.
By the way, there are photos of each designer's work in this episode on the blog itself, but I couldn't figure out how to make them show up in "Blogger". Chairman Ann, is that just a limitation of the application?
And now, read on:
Una LaMarche.Editor of 'The Sassy Curmudgeon'
Posted: September 20, 2010 09:00
Project Runway Episode 8 Recap: Camelot/Camel Toe
Previously on: In exchange for doing a boring resort wear challenge, Tim got everyone drunk and Michael Kors gave out free sunglasses. But mimosas and swag could not prepare the designers for the wrath of the velvet bag, which divided them into teams of two and forced them to sew each other's looks. A seamless collaboration with Christopher resulted in a first-time win for April, while Michael Drummond struggled with Ivy's design (and crazy-making micromanagement). In the end, though, Casanova's grandma-inspired outfit sent him back to Astoria to continue playing with New York's balls.
It's morning at the Atlas apartments, and everyone, it seems, is tweezing his or her eyebrows. "Is it quieter in here?" Chris wonders aloud, and if you listen very carefully, drowning out the soft drone of Andy's airbrush makeup machine and the snap of elastics as April perfects her Pebbles Flintstone bun and the clatter of Michael C's eyes rolling around in his head, you can almost hear Casanova whisper "Exxxxxaaaaaaactly."
"The work room will be less fun without Casanova," Michael D. interviews. And, well, yeah. Once the sluts and the old ladies have left the party, who's worth talking to?
I think Michael Costello and Andy are in an apartment by themselves now, which is unfortunate because Andy clearly loathes Michael C. Every scene consists of Michael C. yapping away about something and Andy gazing up through his man-bangs with an unmistakable look of thinly-veiled contempt. In this instance, MC is explaining how he got called out during judging for bad-mouthing Ivy. Over in the ladies' bunker, Val asks Ivy how she's feeling. "Yesterday was yesterday," Ivy says bluntly, adding in a talking head that people have told her before that she'll never make it and that she can't listen to those idiots.
One of those idiots is, apparently, Michael D., who tells Chris and Mondo that he thinks Ivy "really needs to prove why she's here and step it up." He cites her monochromatic palette as a drawback, observing dryly that "opaque is not a color." Ooooooh, Michael, them's fightin' words. Color you badd, girl.
At Parsons, Heidi emerges (bagless!) onto the runway. "For this challenge," she tells the designers, "You will be looking to the past to secure your future." Gretchen, who is dressed like some cross between Liesl von Trapp and a Grateful Dead roadie, says that stepping back in time could mean anything, and that all she knows is that she doesn't want to be forced to make a corset. She says this while making a pronounced stankface, which leads me to believe that Gretchen is not a big fan of boning.
The gang arrives at something identified onscreen as "Capsule Studio" to find Tim standing in front of a big white sheet upon which images of Jackie Kennedy are projected. Welcome, friends, to the most ghetto challenge intro in Project Runway history.
"No, I'm totally serious. Lifetime has run out of money. Your challenge this week is to run the slide projector while I go get tanked with the cast of Army Wives."
They don't even have a pretend special guest who works for one of the show's sponsors (we all know Collier Strong could rock a Chanel suit). They don't even have a gimmicky location (JFK airport, anyone?). Tim is just kind of like, "Jacqueline Kennedy represents how the world perceives classic American sportswear, so, um, make something like that."
(Here I should mention that I have a bias against this challenge because I do not and never will understand what "sportswear" is supposed to mean. It sounds like it means exercise clothes, or sport-specific attire like the saddlebag-baring nylon short shorts I was forced to wear at high school track meets. That's what Wikipedia thinks it means, too, but in fashion, apparently, "sportswear" just means anything you wouldn't go to a cocktail party in. A trench coat can be sportswear, as can pants as can skirts as can dresses. If it's made of wool or cotton, it qualifies. Which, in my opinion, is too vague to make for a decent challenge, especially on the heels of the resort wear week, which was also boring and vague but which at least trotted out a cruise ship and a dramatic twist to distract us.)
At Mood, Mondo reveals a special pathetic fallacy: apparently, he can commune with fabric. "The bolts have voices," he tells us. "They say, come over and pick me up." Tim tells Gretchen to remember that she's a leader -- as if she needs the reminder; Gretchen's ego is more inflated than Heidi Montag's boobs these days. Ivy says that she has no clear vision but has chosen her colors: white and black or white and navy. (WOAH, Higa. Let's not get crazy now.) Michael Drummond second-guesses his choices at the cash register...
...and continues to do so back in the workroom. "This will either be really good, or really bad," he muses. "I don't like sportswear." Meanwhile, no sooner has Mondo draped some fabric on a mannequin than Gretchen becomes concerned about his look. "I feel he might not be hitting the nail on the head with this one," she interviews. Aaaaaaaaaaagggggggggghhhh, no one asked you, Gretchen. Well, okay, fine, the producers probably asked you, but don't you have more important things to do, like hand-cut some chevron patterns or style your lady mullet?
Business in the front, petty in the back. Hey-o!
I know I'm being bitchy this week. Forgive me -- I'm hormonal and I'm halfway through a liter of Diet Coke. Also I'm wearing my husband's boxer briefs and a shirt that says "Snackers do it between meals" as I prepare to judge the clothing of others. Wait, what am I saying? Pay no attention to the woman behind the curtain! (Also, in my defense, I got the shirt for free. The only slogan tees I purchase have obscure LL Cool J lyrics on them. I am nothing if not discerning.)
Where was I? Oh. Michael Drummond is entertaining the work room with his one-liners. "For this challenge I decided to channel the earliest Americans -- the Puritans!" he crows, working on a prairie-like skirt. Valerie once again compares herself to Susan Lucci and bemoans her failure to win a challenge after coming so close so many times. Mondo interviews that people are psyching themselves out, and that the group is now so small that if you even screw up once you're going home.
Michael C. is ensuring he doesn't go home by making approximately 200 different dresses. "This looks too flight attendant/stewardess, right?" he asks Andy, who glances over through his man-bangs and says, "Kind of," in a voice that implies, "Go fuck yourself." Forget Austin and Santino, these two need their own show. Meanwhile, Val and Gretchen make fun of the parachute pants Andy is crafting. "I'm kind of worried about Andy's pants," Valerie says. "I kind of hope he keeps going with it." I just love me some schadenfreude.
Tim comes to check in. He starts with Christopher, who is making a gray cocktail dress that might best be described as "stately." ("No one is gonna want to see that at Fashion Week," April interviews. "It looks like my grandmother's clothes.") Tim is troubled by Michael Drummond's skirt, likening it to Annie Get Your Gun. "I also don't want her to look like she has a ruler and beats children," MD jokes, which cracks Tim up. Next up is Valerie, who's making a fitted black pant that Tim finds "vulgar." Valerie asks what she should do and Tim tells her she has to make the choices. Michael D. interviews that Val doesn't want to make design decisions on her own. Faring better under the Gunn is Mondo, whose fabric choice -- an oversized herringbone print in black, white, and purple -- makes Tim giddy. "If you took Jackie Kennedy to the desert and gave her some mescaline to eat, then you would have Jackie Kennedy in Mondo," says Michael Drummond. And now I think we know why Mondo can hear fabric talking to him.
The models arrive. Mondo's model says that the outfit reminds her of the First Lady, and Mondo mumbles, "First Tranny." (That's right, birthers -- you've been so focused on finding Barack's secret Kenyan documents that you've completely overlooked the REAL coup: Michelle is a DUDE.) As Andy fits his pants on his model, April interviews that Jackie K. would not wear them no matter what the time period, adding that the fit "was, like, goin' up her ass!"
Unwittingly, April makes a pitch-perfect "up the butt" face.
In keeping with the kinky theme, Andy ties a piece of lace around Michael D's eyes, leading Gretchen to declare MD's workspace "the Prairie Home Sex Shop."
The day of the runway show (OR IS IT??? <--foreshadowing, I rock at it), April says she thinks all of the girls are in the clear, and that Andy's outfit is more like "Jackie Yo!" than Jackie O. Over in the boys' room, Michael C. sucks up to Andy and says that Jackie would totes wear the parachute pants because she was a risk-taker. Michael Drummond and Chris tell Mondo that he looks kind of like Jackie, if she came back as a tranny.
At Parsons, Tim comes in to announce that it is NOT, in fact, a runway day (!!!). Instead, the designers will have the afternoon to create a piece of outerwear to complement their existing looks. Michael D. is excited because, as he explains, "I'm a knitwear designer by trade -- I am Captain Outerwear." (Incidentally, Captain Outerwear was one of Marvel Comics' least successful franchises, as a musclebound man wearing nothing but a codpiece, tights, and a trench coat was deemed potentially inappropriate for children).
Michael C., on the other hand, is less than enthused with the twist. "I'm from Palm Springs," he says. "I don't do outerwear." Valerie already made a jacket as part of her look, and asks Tim if it counts. Tim says no and snaps that he "was surprised to see you had created a jacket." Okay. Y'all know I don't usually take issue with Tim, but first of all, contestants make jackets all the time, and there was no reason for Valerie to think she couldn't make a jacket as part of this incredibly vague "American sportswear" challenge. Secondly, why does Tim hate Valerie? Sure, she can be annoying, but she's no villain like Emilio. And yet there is clear, one-sided animosity there. Anyone have any insights? Or is Tim just on the rag like me?
Everyone goes back to Mood, which is uneventful except for this little gift from the editors, an Everybody Hates Gretchen short. Michael C. is looking for a soft stretch wool and sees a bolt sticking out. But when he goes to take it...
You're not grabbing that, actually. You're ten feet away.
Granted, Gretchen may have pulled the bolt out from the wall before Michael came along, but the point is that the editors want her to look like an asshole. "I could have been a bitch about it, but I rise above it," says Michael C., unconvincingly.
Back (yet again!) in the work room, Val is heartbroken over the challenge, because she is an outerwear designer but got tripped up by the twist seeing as she already had a jacket made. Meanwhile, Chris struggles with the long, nappy fur on the incredibly unattractive hide he has purchased.
Michael C. made a beige jacket but it looks like a terrycloth towel. Gretchen interviews that during every challenge, MC "creates multiple things and then waits for Tim to tell him what to do." Michael C. knows that people are talking about him and wondering how he could have won two challenges, but decides that "if you're gonna hate on me... then step up your game and win a fucking challenge." Touche.
Tim comes back--again!--for critiques. This is mostly notable because it's when he says the best line of the episode, to Andy: "Jackie Kennedy would not have camel toe." Camelot? Yes. Camel toe? No.
The next morning, at Atlas, Michael Drummond thinks he is going home. And Mondo thinks, apparently, that he is starring as the emcee in the Lollipop Guild's production of Cabaret.
Either that or he's the lesbian love child of Dora the Explorer and Lisa "Left Eye" Lopes.
In the sewing room, Valerie tells Gretchen that she's on the fence about Michael C.'s dress, and Gretchen replies that she's not into it. "Will the judges overlook that it's a knockoff?" Val wonders, and Gretchen says that they have every other time. Michael Drummond interviews that some people are not into Michael C. because they're elitist and have big heads. The editors cut to Gretchen, which I'm sure is just a coincidence.
Christopher loves his dress, but his shrug? Not so much. (And with good reason: It looks like fresh roadkill.) At the eleventh hour, the zipper on Mondo's skirt breaks and he nearly has a heart attack. Michael D. is still sewing his jacket two minutes before runway time. As they head out the door, Gretchen feels compelled to share that she's nervous for 50 percent of the room. "Andy's doesn't read Jacqueline," she interviews. "Michael C.'s is just a cocktail dress with a jacket over it. Christopher's is just odd!" She can't even fathom who will be in the bottom three because she thinks there might be more than three in the bottom. Oh, shut it, Gretchen.
Guess who's guest-judging this week? Betty Draper! I look forward to many affectless stares.
Here we go:
_________
CHRISTOPHER
Let's put aside for a moment the fact that the shrug makes it seem like Chris' model is getting felt up by the Crypt Keeper from behind. The dress is pretty but underwhelming, and the belt looks like something from a kid's Power Rangers costume. But the shrug is the worst. It's like she's carrying around her dessicated pupal skin. How you doin', sixth grade biology?
APRIL
We didn't get to see any of April's construction process, so I actually don't know precisely what this is. I know it's, um, black. And probably inspired by a morgue, or mental institution. Maybe it's just my eyes (I've almost drained the liter of Diet Coke by now, and have been staring at my computer screen for almost 6 hours), but to me this looks like most of April's other work: a vaguely punky, black mishmosh.
IVY
I do like this, but I don't love it. First of all, it's Ivy's, and I don't like her. So there's that. It also strikes me as very safe in certain ways: Jackie O. has worn outfits quite similar to this one and the model is styled to resemble her. I have reservations about the pants from this angle. But I love the asymmetrical neckline and the sheer organza coat. So, begrudgingly, I will say: Well played, Ivy. Well played.
MICHAEL C.
Meh. This looks like an outfit some fictional harlot would wear to school on one of those C-list teen dramas like One Tree Hill.
GRETCHEN
This is Robin Hood by way of Anthropologie. It's Maid Marian after a spree at Urban Outfitters (and a trip back in time to my closet in 1996 to steal the sweet brown halter top I bought from Contempo Casuals with my birthday money from grandma). As much as I dislike Gretchen on the show, I can usually concede that she's one of the better designers. But this is just ugly.
MICHAEL D.
Dear Jessica Wakefield,
Just because you have a perfect size six figure doesn't mean you look good in everything.
Love,
Una
Sorry, I have a long-standing beef with J-Dubs. Anyway, listen: the skirt is fugly and needs to die. I don't know what he was thinking. The tops are... weird. The jacket is cute but doesn't go with the rest of it, and isn't cute enough to save the rest of it.
VAL
I've been avoiding making the following observation because it has nothing to do with the clothes, but... does Val's model look a little bit... world-weary to anyone else? I just want her to lie down and take a nap. Anyway, the outfit is not helping. It's not a total eyesore, but it's frumpy. Something about the fit and the proportions are just not chic. And the skirt looks really cheap. I think Val would have been better off sticking with the original pants.
ANDY
The hair and the boots make me think this is one of those American Girl dolls -- specifically, Felicity, the spunky Colonial-era equestrian. But the pants make me think of a lesser-known American Girl, Baggy McBunchyCrotch, a Scottish immigrant living in squalor in a New York City tenement whose mother made clothes from sooty bedsheets. Unsurprisingly, that doll was discontinued due to poor sales.
MONDO
[The heavens open]
"Dreamweaver" starts playing, and not just because Mondo's model kind of looks like Tia Carrere.
Now this is some sportswear I can get behind.
Sure, it's a little Jackie Yo! Gabba Gabba, but that's Mondo. And that's why I love him.
_________
Back on the runway, Heidi calls forward Michael C., April, and Gretchen, all of whom are safe. As they enter the designers' lounge, Michael C. says he thought he was going home for sure. Gretchen is also shocked, but for different reasons. "I thought mine looked like the modern spirit of what sportswear is," she says, shaking her head in disbelief. Michael C. immediately agrees with her, and then interviews that what he said was total bullshit. And I kind of love him for giving Gretchen the same fake, patronizing encouragement she gives so routinely to everyone else.
The judges critique Valerie first. Heidi makes a big deal over the fact that Val has two pieces of outerwear, and I wonder why they don't let her explain that she had already made the original jacket when the twist was announced. This whole challenge seems really unfair to Valerie for that reason, but the judges don't cut her any slack. Michael Kors calls the whole thing sad. "The ankle boot confuses me with that length of skirt," says January Jones, which strikes me as unintentionally hilarious. Nina points out that every time Valerie makes a design reference it's pleating and zippers. The judges are bitchy this week!
They spare Christopher much of their venom, heaping praise on his dress. But as for the shrug... "It looks like a dirty old rug," Heidi says flatly. Everyone agrees that the dress looks much better without it.
Michael Kors takes umbrage at Michael Drummond's "schizophrenic Jackie" (perhaps Parker Posey in The House of Yes?). "This is a woman who, quite frankly, looked fabulous for four decades, and now she's in a mall!" MK says, "And the fact that you think what you've made has anything to do with American sportswear... I'm insulted." Nina also invokes Jackie's iconic status, as though making a drop-waist skirt is tantamount to taking a crap on her grave. Heidi thinks the top doesn't fit. "It looks sloppy," says Betty Draper, who is probably drunk.
Mondo says that he has a photo of Jackie in his kitchen, and drew inspiration from the images of her running from paparrazi. Heidi thinks it looks sharp, and while the print is loud it's something Jackie might wear. Heidi also loves the purple lining of the jacket. MK thinks the striped tee is fabulous and well-tailored. Nina says that the mix of prints is very clever, and that the overall outfit is fun yet still elegant and chic.
Ivy wanted to create something timeless that played with shapes. MK says that it's intrinsically elegant, noting that the styling is very Jackie O. He likes the neckline and the architectural quality of the top and jacket. Heidi disagrees, saying that there's too much design in the top, and citing the too-small jacket's "boob hole." Nina thinks it was smart to keep it black and white.
The judges have been pretty nice for a few minutes, which means they have a stockpile of vitriol to vomit all over poor Andy. And really, it gets ugly. Heidi says she wanted to crack up when she saw the look. January Jones says that she doesn't really see American sportswear in the clothes, and when Andy says that he he struggled with it because he doesn't necessarily see himself as an American sportswear designer, MK snaps, "So what are you, a grand couturier? Did I miss something?" He goes on to describe the ensemble as "MC Hammer meets the Beverly Hillbillies grandmother." Heidi is still cackling over the pants, and taunts Andy, asking if he wants to come down and look at them from another angle. Then Nina goes in for the kill, attacking the vest and the shirt, and calling the overall look "a train wreck." It's like they're mean drunks.
Backstage, everyone agrees that the judges were unusually tough. "They basically laughed at me," Andy says. "That was hard to take." Michael Drummond says that the whole Jackie O. style icon for the ages thing put too much pressure on everyone. Valerie thinks she's going home.
The designers reconvene on the runway. Heidi announces that Mondo was the clear winner of the challenge--yay! Mondo absolutely deserves this one. Christopher is also safe, followed by Ivy. Despite being so thoroughly shit upon, Andy is also safe. Which leaves Season 8's comic relief duo, Val and Michael D., in the bottom two. They look at each other and sigh.
Heidi lowers the boom: Valerie created inexpensive, badly executed mall wear. Michael's look was an unfortunate mis-match that was bulky and unflattering.
"Valerie... you're in."
Which means Michael D. is out.
Ah, well. It was his time. I would have been more upset if Val had gone home; even though she needs to get her groove back, I think she's the better designer. And hey, at least now I can stop using an initial after the name Michael. Tim comes in, visibly distraught, and bids adieu to Michael (D. -- last time!), who skips off to look up "Waterloo" and return home to his giant electric loom.
Next week: The winner of what looks to be the L'Oreal-sponsored challenge gets some unprecedented prize that gets everyone excited. Valerie considers forfeiting and cries in the bathroom. Tim makes a big announcement that spooks him so badly he's shaking. And Heidi tells someone that they have to choose between boobs or legs (it's unclear if she's serving poultry at the time).
Monday, September 13, 2010
PR: S8E7 Brenda's Blast
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
60 Lbs. of Footwear
I'm thoroughly enjoying PR, Season 8, but don't have much to comment on. Between Brenda, Bethie, Ann and Tim and TLo, just about everything that needs to be said about the Mean Girls and the Sweet Nerds has been placed under a fine microscope and analyzed to death. And then, even if none of you have been coerced into watching Mad Men, I am INTENSELY devoted to it and watching each episode and then trolling the blogs (TLo now posts nearly every day on this show--the plots, the themes, the--yes--metaphors and similes, the clothes, the props)--I am living half of the time in 2010 and the other half in 1965. How can I get at least one of you interested in this show so I can have a Mad Men pal I actually know, not some cyber acquaintances whose opinions are not as meaningful to me as those of my dear friends, y'all!
See the method to my madness? I've posted to the blog but haven't read either of the two (or four) books on the table. Really, posting is almost as good as actually reading a book, am I right or not? Well, not but still...give me a "C" for effort.
I do have Laura Bennett's book in audio form on my Kindle and see a nice, lazy weekend ahead, listening to her opinions (she narrates her own book) on matters fashionable and maternal, lounging in my favorite chair and stitching on my new needlepoint frame, "the last needlepoint frame you'll ever need" per the brochure I received and I think it may be true. Brenda, I see one in your future.
All in all, good times!!!!
Monday, September 6, 2010
Think of a Numb3r - review
Sunday, September 5, 2010
PR: S8E6 Brenda's Blast
Monday, August 30, 2010
Do I get any points if I have the book?
The BLBC Book List
Our new, improved schedule:
June (Ann)
Main Selection - The Lincoln Lawyer, Michael Connelley
Alt Selection - The Help, Kathryn Stockett
July (Bethie)
Main Selection - Think of a Numb3r, John Verdon
Alt Selection - The Cookbook Collector, Allegra Goodman
August (Brenda)
Main Selection -
Alt Selection -
September (Susan)
Main Selection -
Alt Selection -
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Opening Argument: Gretchen vs. The World
Here's a riff by someone screen-named Brooklyn Bomber who is one of the 400 people logging on to articulate how much they hate (or love...some do) our Villain du Jour, Wretchen Gretchen. Read it and see how it a giggle like this can immediately enhance your (gray, drippy here...YAY!) day.
Ann has already had to listen to me to an live enactment of this so I hope she won't mind being exposed to it again!
8/27/10 4:54 PM
Brooklyn Bomber said...
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we stand before you, asking for mercy. At this desperate hour, we find ourselves on our knees, urging you to think not of what you have seen today, but of what you have seen before, and of what you may yet see.
Citizens, spare these humble lives. Keep us from the gallows this day, for truly, if one is guilty, all are guilty. And yet, if you are to spare one, spare all, for through us runs the common thread (no pun intended). Are we not all, each in his own way, but humble tailors: sketching, cutting, stitching? When we prick ourselves with a straight pin, do we not bleed? Do we not want what you want? A humble home, a loaf of bread, a straw mat on which to rest, $100,000 from L’Oreal Paris to start our own line and a $50,000 HP technology suite?
Despite what some here would have you to believe, our collection is not the devil’s child. We are neither coven nor cabal. We are neither more nor less than a humble community, united by common cause and unshakable mutual love and respect. If loyalty is a crime, find us guilty. Yet we have broken no laws of the state and, most significantly, we have upheld the laws of the greatest judge of all, He who sees all and who knows the purity of our hearts and the superiority of our design and sewing skills.
Or, that is, the superiority of the design and sewing skills of most of us. A few of us, anyway. Well, me and my little friend over here to my left. The rest, I’m not sure. Especially the guy to my right. I mean, if you’ve gotta off someone, I recommend him. He’s kind of a fuck up. Yeah, sure, the law doesn’t allow you to choose him, but rules are made to be broken, right, ladies and gents? Okay, okay, if you can’t take him, how about Marcel Marceau down there at the end of the line? We can carry on without him if we have to, know what I mean, ladies ‘n germs?
Friday, August 27, 2010
PR: S8E5 Brenda's Blast
Monday, August 23, 2010
Two new things
Thing 2: Let's try adding to our blog with our Project Runway comments ... good practice for your blogging skills.
PR: S8E4
I watched this episode twice ... once with Susan while rebuilding/repairing her computer and once while I was assembling my new kitchen chairs. This means I probably watched a total of one third of it ... so much for multitasking.
Kristin: totally deserved the auf ... and explain to me how an orchid is "architectural" ... what a missed opportunity. And she got the "whiney" editing.
Valerie: better than Michael C ... was channeling Jeffery Sabelia (?) with the zippers ... nice counter to mask/hat.
April: what was she thinking ... she should have listened to Tim! And that back zipper in the diaper ... beyond bizarre.
Gretchen: I can't remember what she did.
Peach: I can't believe I'm going to say this: Peach needs to work with Michael C on choosing fabrics.
Christopher: his dress/coat was a great match to the hat ... the judges were all wrong ... maybe a little editing with the belt and skirt but not a bottom 3 piece.
Michael C: he makes Casanova look good ... predicted bottom 3 ... the judges were all wrong ... but I did love the fabric.
Casanova: what is with that Boy Scout shirt?
Ivy: her self affirmations didn't help ... boring
Mondo: I always choose big polka dots for my butt
Michael D: should have won! His outfit was perfect for that lima bean hat.
Saturday, August 14, 2010
A book Twit from Stephen Fry - August 13th 1:24am
Perhaps a good site -- Five Books -- for us book types!
Thanks to @elvis717 forhttp://fivebooks.com/archive truly wonderful site...
Every day an eminent writer, thinker, commentator, politician, academic chooses five books on their specialist subject. From Einstein to Keynes, Iraq to the Andes, Communism to Empire. Share in the knowledge and buy the books.
Saturday, July 31, 2010
July Book Selections


Thursday, July 1, 2010
Other May Book (Title Too Long To Type!)
Our second May book (yes, I know, it’s now July but…) has been living in the shadows of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo for a bit too long, as Ann very politely reminded me today.
This is a quiet book, nearly exactly the opposite of the Stieg Larsson blockbusters. It is what we were taught in English Lit 101 was called an “epistolary novel,” meaning the story is told entirely through an exchange of letters. In theory and in general, people don’t cotton much to this format. Letters sound kind of boring and indeed I can’t imagine just how boring they might sound to people who are under 30 and rely entirely on email or tweets for their primary person-to-person communication!
In this particularly charming novel of letters set in 1946, the main character, Juliet, finds herself bored with writing successful upbeat columns about the small pleasures of living through the war in Britain and looks around for another challenge. She finds it accidentally when a book she had once owned and (presumably) donated or sold to a used book store eventually finds its way to Guernsey, a small British island that is actually closer to France than to the UK mainland. Guernsey is geographically isolated from Britain and is even more cut off after the German army invades it and occupies it throughout WWII. For the most part (with a few notable exceptions), the occupying German forces treat the residents of the island harshly and corral most of the island’s resources for their own needs. Among many other deprivations, food is severely rationed and a curfew is imposed on all island residents. Along with nearly everything else, books are in very short supply.
A small group of friends secretly plans a meal with food hidden from the Nazis and, losing track of time, begin to return to their homes after curfew. They are apprehended by German soldiers and in an effort to justify their curfew violation, one of their more creative members explains (falsely) that they belong to an innocent-sounding literary society and had lost track of time due to their stimulating conversation about books. Then, to make their story look true, they decide to continue the charade, although few of them have any real interest in reading. Over the course of the novel, the group becomes a kind of family; books are sought out, read and discussed; and they all begin to correspond with Juliet. Initially, they contact her because she lives in London and they are hopeful that she can track down books they’d like to read. Eventually, she decides their story might be a good kick-off point for her own next book and asks each of the Society’s members to write her about their literary interests and how they each fit into the overall human geography of the island.
This general outline doesn’t really give any idea why this was such an engrossing book. It charms because of the distinct personalities of the Guernsey readers; the affect the German occupation has on such an isolated, hardscrabble society; and because of the way the pseudo literary society bands together to take care of a 4-year child left behind when her mother is abruptly arrested by the occupying army and sent off to an internment camp. The stories merge when Juliet arrives in Guernsey to get more direct information for her proposed book. For a novel about the hardships of war, there is an underlying sunny-ness and camaraderie that is almost irresistible. The characters are lovable for the most part, but not all of them are painted as being equally easy to love. There are characters that are so eccentric or so bitter that it takes work to see their good points but the writer(s) take the time to create round enough personalities that we begin to like even the most difficult ones. And, from a purely historical standpoint, the book covers an extremely little-known aspect of WWII, humanizes it, and makes it come to life.
As an aside, after I read this book (fortunately, for the sake of the May’s books, the P-Town book group read it last year), I read another one recommended to me by my sister-in-law Beth, which was an interesting complement to The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society—Sarah’s Key, by Tatiana de Rosnay. It’s about a similarly little-known WWII incident, the round-up by the French police after the Germans invaded and occupied France, of 10,000 Jews. The French police were not acting on orders from the Nazis but in anticipation of maybe being asked to do so at some later point. Nearly all 10,000 were initially held in deplorable conditions in a stadium in Paris, the Val d’Hiver, and then sent by train to Auschwitz, where almost all of them died. The most horrifying aspect of this incident was that men were rounded up first, then women and children at a later date. Once the women and children were collected and imprisoned in the stadium for a few days, the women were separated from the children and sent on ahead to a Nazi work camp. The children (from babies to pre-teens) were left alone in the stadium and ultimately sent to a different part of Auschwitz, where, without any maternal care, most died almost immediately. I certainly won’t paint this as an uplifting book, but if you’re interested in learning more about another little-known Nazi atrocity, and you’ve already read The Diary of Anne Frank often enough, Sarah’s Key is another gripping story that was very hard to put down.
Signing off, your despotic-rulers’ literary correspondent,
Susan
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Very cool cases: Scandinavian crime novels are exceptionally hot properties
By Neely Tucker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 17, 2010; C01
So you know about the insanely popular Scandinavian crime novelist, right, the author who has sold 3 million books in Sweden (pop. 9 million)? The one published in 40 languages? The crime-writing legend with more than 30 million books in print worldwide?
If you said the late Stieg Larsson, the publishing phenom who has sold more than 500,000 copies of his latest book, "The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest," in the month since it was released, who currently has the No. 1 book in hardcover fiction, trade paperback and mass-market paperback -- well, get a clue.
Camilla Läckberg is the Swedish crime writer whose seven books have dominated Stockholm bestseller lists (she makes her American debut this week). Norwegian Jo Nesbø is the guy published in 40 languages. And Sweden's Henning Mankell, the godfather of the Swedish crime thriller genre, has been moving millions of books the world over since creating police detective Kurt Wallander nearly two decades ago.
With Larsson now leading the charge -- 1.8 million hardcover and e-book copies of his "Millennium" trilogy have been sold in the United States in past 16 months, with another 2.8 million paperbacks in print -- more than half a dozen Swedes, Danes, Norwegians and Icelanders have become international crime-writing stars, churning out wildly popular tales of law and disorder from nations with some of the lowest crime rates on the planet. It's become so ingrained in the popular culture that Läckberg got her start in an all-female crime-writing class 10 years ago.
"Twenty-five years ago you had Björn Borg and very few other tennis players in Sweden," Mankell says in a telephone interview from his home in Gothenburg, giving his explanation for the explosion in popularity of his peers. "Then he had success and then there came Stefan Edberg and Mats Wilander and all of a sudden we had a lot of them. . . . In that way, I might be sort of a locomotive that started the train."
Läckberg, 35, mother of three and stepmother of two, published her debut novel, "The Ice Princess," in Sweden in 2003, but it's finally reaching U.S. readers. It's a highly touted, moody tale of a long-ago murder in a tiny resort town of Fjällbacka. It's a monstrous bestseller in Europe (a British trade magazine ranked her as the continent's sixth-most-popular author last year) and Pegasus Books, her American publisher, is hoping for similar success here.
She says that Scandinavian crime writers "owe a lot to Stieg Larsson" for their international success since his trilogy began conquering the world in 2005. She recounts a story about how "Princess" was snatched up by a French publisher eager to ride Larsson's popularity after his first book, "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo." Her book has since sold 300,000 copies in France, she says, and there's a movie deal already signed there.
"People don't usually perceive Swedes as action heroes," she says in a telephone interview from her home in Stockholm. "But a real window has opened up. It's sort of thrilling and sort of surreal. . . . I was at a book festival in Madrid and the schedule had me booked to sign autographs for three hours. Three hours! I thought it was a mistake. I got there, and it wasn't. I could barely move my right hand afterwards."
The 'Snow' stormIf there was a beginning to the Scandinavian international crime novel, it was likely "Smilla's Sense of Snow," Danish author Peter Høeg's 1992 book about an attractive, antisocial woman from Greenland who had an obsession with snow and with the death of a child in her apartment building. It was a huge international hit, fueled by a riveting plot and by Smilla's lyrical insights into the forbidding realm of ice:
"Now the ice will stay," she thinks to herself at one point in early winter, "now the crystals have formed bridges and enclosed the salt water in pockets that have a structure like the veins of a tree through which the liquid slowly seeps; not many who look over toward Holmen think about this, but it's one reason for believing that ice and life are related in many ways."
It was about this time that Mankell, across the water in Sweden, began a series of novels about a morose, alcohol-swilling police detective who was disillusioned, divorced and diabetic. This was Wallander, the star of 10 books and, recently, a British television series starring Kenneth Branagh (it has been aired in the United States on PBS).
He's as iconic a figure in Scandinavian pop literature as, say, Philip Marlowe is in the United States.
Mankell became a major star in Europe before first being published in the United States in 2003. He has since sold 750,000 books here, 88 percent of those involving the 10 Wallander titles. His newest, "The Man From Beijing," which does not involve the detective, has sold 75,000 copies in hardcover and e-book since being published by Knopf this spring.
Mankell's dark tones, his concern with development of character over relentless plot, the weight of the subarctic cold and gloom, became the model for the next generation of Scandinavian authors. Typically covered in frost and a sense of foreboding, the Scandinavian thrillers eschew some of the bang-bang-shoot-'em-up of their American contemporaries for a more stately pace through bloody homicide. There was racism with recent immigrants, the collapse of the neighboring Eastern Bloc countries and the corruption of the state to be concerned with, these writers found, not just a serial killer skinning people alive.
"The success of Mankell opened the door to a lot of Scandinavian writers," says Otto Penzler, owner of the Mysterious Bookshop in New York and editor of the seminal "The Black Lizard Big Book of Pulps," a collection of early detective fiction. "People liked it, and he was only doing one book a year, so it didn't really fill the appetite. People would ask, 'Do you have someone else like that?' Well, yeah, we did, because it's all so similar."
Writers like Nesbø, Iceland's Arnalder Indridason and Norway's Karin Fossum put together series of books, often focusing on one recurring character and often playing along the familiar lines of the standard noir thriller, the kind of thing created in the United States by titans such as Raymond Chandler and Dashiell Hammett.
"They're all usually placed in cold, dark, wintry settings, with people drinking a lot to keep warm," Penzler says. "There's the general gloominess of the people, who seem resigned to the worst thing happening. There's not much humor. There certainly are no Carl Hiaasens or Elmore Leonards."
Into this brew came Larsson. A former Swedish wire service reporter and graphic designer, by his late 40s he was running a magazine called Expo, dedicated to exposing racist and fascist groups. He noodled around with a crime thriller idea for several years, and eventually based his two main characters on two icons of Swedish children's literature: Pippi Longstocking, the adventure-seeking red-haired girl in pigtails; and Kalle Blomkvist, the boy detective.
Misfit grownupsIn October 2004, months before the first of his books was published, he gave a somewhat cranky interview to Lasse Winkler, editor of a Swedish book trade magazine. He said that he imagined those two fictional characters as misfit grownups. Pippi morphed into Lisbeth Salander, the bisexual computer-hacking punk who is the title character in "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo" and the two subsequent books of the trilogy. Kalle morphed into Mikael Blomkvist, a troubled, 40-something journalist stung by a libel conviction. The two work together in sorting through mysteries of corporate corruption, family secrets, violent death and various forms of abuse against women. (Misogyny is such a part of the first book that its title in Sweden is "Men Who Hate Women.")
He wrote all three books before submitting them to a publisher. He had no doubts he was about to become a rich man.
"I know they're good," Winkler quotes him as saying. "I knew that someone would want to publish them. This is my retirement fund."
A chain-smoking workaholic, he died of a heart attack three weeks later. He was 50.
The books have become a worldwide publishing phenomenon -- more than 30 million copies are in print, a number that rises by the hour -- and has pulled along the rest of the Scandinavian crime-writing crowd in their wake.
Sonny Mehta, the publisher and editor in chief of Knopf, publishes Mankell, Larsson and some of Nesbø's titles, almost cornering the market for subarctic crime thrillers in the United States.
"It is extraordinary, this strain of crime writing appears to be persistent in all the Scandinavian countries," he says. "They don't zip along, these things. They're brooding. It's not plot-driven in the way that many of their American contemporaries are. . . . Part of the appeal is you're being introduced to something that should be familiar, that seems familiar, but it's not."
Thursday, June 17, 2010
June Books
So, here are June's books.
Main Selection:
Lincoln Lawyer by Michael Connelly
Michael Connelly is part of the genre I call "loner guys who go around beating up people". I started reading these books when I was a workaholic and very stressed out. Connelly has a long series with the character Harry Bosch, an LA cop with issues. The Lincoln Lawyer started as a standalone book but he has since added one more with the same character, Mickey Haller (a lawyer with issues).
I think Connelly tells a good story, develops good characters and shows you LA.
http://www.michaelconnelly.com/Book_Collection/Lincoln/lincoln.html
Alternate Selection:
Eat Pray Love by Elizabeth Gilbert
I know, I know ... either you've already read this or everyone has told you to read it. It it my favorite charming book. When I finished this book I turned to the beginning and read it again.
http://www.elizabethgilbert.com/eatpraylove.htm
Next up for July books is Bethie.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
The Girl Who Loaned Her Book to Strangers...
When a book (or a restaurant or a museum exhibit or whatever) is very popular before I personally discover it, I develop a resistance to whatever is being blessed by the majority—this means that, for example, I never saw E.T. or read The DaVinci Code or saw the King Tut’s tomb exhibit or ate at Postrio or The French Laundry.
So it’s a really good thing that the P-Town Library book group read The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo more than a year ago, right after it was released in the US. At that time, I knew nothing about Stieg Larsson or the Millenium Trilogy. That allowed me to read Volume I without feeling like I was a lemming, following the crowd. Because in this instance--and probably in many others--the madding crowd was right. Stieg Larsson, with no prior fiction-writing experience at all, created a set of characters in situations that are more compelling than almost anything I’ve ever read in my long life as a compulsive reader!
I can’t separate this book from the two that followed and, according to our Research Director, Ms. Brenda, who heard a lecture from the guy who translated all 3 books from Swedish into English, they really were for the most part intended to be 3 parts of a single story, except that no one would publish a 1500-page novel. That being said, to me, the first book was the most conventional of the 3, with a structure similar to a traditional mystery novel: establish characters, establish antagonists and protagonists, get main character(s) somehow involved in the mystery, unravel the mystery, tie up issues, end book. That fact didn’t make me dislike the book in any way, by the way. On its own, it was one of the most gripping mysteries I’ve ever read, but by the 2nd book, Larsson seemed to find his footing, and removed the need for an external mystery to set events in motion. His main cast of characters is interesting enough that they can carry an entire book simply by interacting with each other, in both good and very bad ways. The protagonists are Mikael, Lisbeth, Erika, the staff at Millenium, Annika, the few political characters with some integrity. The antagonists are the Swedish government and financial operatives, kingpins and worker bees in the sex trade, and Lisbeth’s father and brother, whom she first meets (and then kills) during the course of the 3 books.
In the first book, Lisbeth and Mikael interact personally, work together to solve the Vanger mystery, and have a brief affair. By the second book, their characters are so established and distinct that the need for them to interact directly is gone. They can contact and assist each other by communicating almost entirely through email and, when necessary, by hacking into each other’s hard-drives or by sending coded messages to each other through a world-wide band of above-the-law techno-outlaws.
Mikael is a character we can instantly like and identify with. He is a left-winger whose radicalism hasn’t softened over time. I think for the 4 of us, his causes make sense to us and we mostly land firmly on his side in any pressing social or political issues. What I’m most curious about is why so many people, including all of us, LOVE Lisbeth. On paper, she is antisocial, mentally unstable, capable of shocking acts of violence in order to right what she personally sees as a wrong. She can’t sustain relationships. She sometimes acts with remarkable kindness, mostly toward other lost souls like herself, but for the most part, she’s a confirmed loner who trusts nearly no one. She commits acts of horrible cruelty toward those who have been cruel to her or cruel to people to with whom she’s had some kind of positive connection. When she can, she steals from the rich to help the underdogs but also allows herself to benefit personally from her thefts. She is completely unapologetic about any of her actions.
So what makes us identify with her and love her?
I turn this question over to you, my beloved little band of bitter kittens!
And on the question of buy it, borrow it or skip it: I am firmly on the side of: BUY IT AND DON’T LOAN IT OUT! These are books I can see re-reading regularly. Now, my Volume 1 is in the hands of a friend of a friend, Book 2 is on my Kindle, and the librarian who runs the P-Town book group loaned all of us, in sequence, the copy of Book 3 her husband got her from Amazon.com.UK, before it was available in the US. So I will have to buy another copy of Volume 1 and grab Volume 3 off the Ethernet.
Buy, baby, buy is my advice!
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Attending Hay Festival could be one of our goals!
As Ann recently said to me ... "hours you will never get back" and so I want you to be in the same boat. I have become totally hooked on following the Hay Festival . Held in that town in Wales filled with book stores. Here are the dates for 2011: May 26 - June 5. I have read most of the RSS feed supported by The Guardian newspaper, watched many minutes of author interviews and now trying to determine if there is a Hulu for the UK so I can watch every episode of The Book Show. The RSS feeds were so wonderful and when I got to this one today about the "little book club", had to share. This could be us next year!
This little book club went to the Hay festival
How one book club expands its repertoire by going on an annual tour to the Hay festival
In a cottage outside Hay there is the clink of car keys dropping into a bowl on the coffee table as a group of teachers, architects, housing managers and IT officers in 1970s shirts and dresses take turns to read from the "lost" Booker prize novels of 1970.
The car keys and the background music – Wuthering Heights by Kate Bush, of course – are little jokes to add an extra dash of that decade to the opening night of this book club's annual trip to the Hay festival. The 10 university friends set up the group five years ago and every year head to Hay for a special session of the club, where they mix nightly discussions of their set texts with a daily trawl of undiscovered and familiar authors at the festival.
Caroline Chatwin, 32, a criminology lecturer based in Canterbury, set up the club so the old friends could expand their reading. Despite being dispersed across Britain, the 10 meet every two months to discuss their chosen book, ending the night by giving it their mark out of 10 – by simultaneously closing their eyes and holding out their fingers.
The highlight, however, is "book club on tour" at Hay. "It's become a staple of the calendar," says Jon Twemlow, a teacher from Sheffield. "It's been really good to see authors we've discussed and discovering authors we wouldn't have otherwise known about," says Rhona Griffiths, who is also a teacher.
If that does not sound very rock'n'roll, the group don't start formal discussions of Muriel Spark's The Driver's Seat until 11.30pm, when IT officer Mike Brophy stands up and announces: "I really like this book but I'm too drunk to explain why." But debate is sparked up and continues until the small hours when they mark Spark with a 7.5/10. At Hay the next day, the group heads off en masse to see Andrea Levy. Members so far have loved Kazuo Ishiguro ("very self-possessed"), Quentin Blake and Grayson Perry. Each year, Hay offers up surprises. Jan Morris was their big discovery last year, and members are already buying armfuls of books, which they will nominate for discussions. But Hay does not always turn them on to their favourites. Three years ago, they were persuaded to pick up Martin Amis's Yellow Dog. Its final score? 0.64/10, the lowest ever.
Post a Comment