Since we're an "unstructured" book club I think a can get away with this: I'm changing my book selection for June. My alternate selection was Eat Pray Love ... I think I was unduly influenced by the new movie (not yet seen). I have since read something I really liked and want to make the it the new June alternate.
Our new, improved schedule:
June (Ann)
Main Selection - The Lincoln Lawyer, Michael Connelley
Alt Selection - The Help, Kathryn Stockett
July (Bethie)
Main Selection - Think of a Numb3r, John Verdon
Alt Selection - The Cookbook Collector, Allegra Goodman
August (Brenda)
Main Selection -
Alt Selection -
September (Susan)
Main Selection -
Alt Selection -
Monday, August 30, 2010
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Opening Argument: Gretchen vs. The World
Dear Unborn Fauns: I think I'm the only one of us obsessive enough to read the musings of the Commentariat on the TLo board, so I believe it is my sacred duty to alert you all when something priceless turns up written by one of our fellow bitter kittens.
Here's a riff by someone screen-named Brooklyn Bomber who is one of the 400 people logging on to articulate how much they hate (or love...some do) our Villain du Jour, Wretchen Gretchen. Read it and see how it a giggle like this can immediately enhance your (gray, drippy here...YAY!) day.
Ann has already had to listen to me to an live enactment of this so I hope she won't mind being exposed to it again!
8/27/10 4:54 PM
Brooklyn Bomber said...
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we stand before you, asking for mercy. At this desperate hour, we find ourselves on our knees, urging you to think not of what you have seen today, but of what you have seen before, and of what you may yet see.
Citizens, spare these humble lives. Keep us from the gallows this day, for truly, if one is guilty, all are guilty. And yet, if you are to spare one, spare all, for through us runs the common thread (no pun intended). Are we not all, each in his own way, but humble tailors: sketching, cutting, stitching? When we prick ourselves with a straight pin, do we not bleed? Do we not want what you want? A humble home, a loaf of bread, a straw mat on which to rest, $100,000 from L’Oreal Paris to start our own line and a $50,000 HP technology suite?
Despite what some here would have you to believe, our collection is not the devil’s child. We are neither coven nor cabal. We are neither more nor less than a humble community, united by common cause and unshakable mutual love and respect. If loyalty is a crime, find us guilty. Yet we have broken no laws of the state and, most significantly, we have upheld the laws of the greatest judge of all, He who sees all and who knows the purity of our hearts and the superiority of our design and sewing skills.
Or, that is, the superiority of the design and sewing skills of most of us. A few of us, anyway. Well, me and my little friend over here to my left. The rest, I’m not sure. Especially the guy to my right. I mean, if you’ve gotta off someone, I recommend him. He’s kind of a fuck up. Yeah, sure, the law doesn’t allow you to choose him, but rules are made to be broken, right, ladies and gents? Okay, okay, if you can’t take him, how about Marcel Marceau down there at the end of the line? We can carry on without him if we have to, know what I mean, ladies ‘n germs?
Here's a riff by someone screen-named Brooklyn Bomber who is one of the 400 people logging on to articulate how much they hate (or love...some do) our Villain du Jour, Wretchen Gretchen. Read it and see how it a giggle like this can immediately enhance your (gray, drippy here...YAY!) day.
Ann has already had to listen to me to an live enactment of this so I hope she won't mind being exposed to it again!
8/27/10 4:54 PM
Brooklyn Bomber said...
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we stand before you, asking for mercy. At this desperate hour, we find ourselves on our knees, urging you to think not of what you have seen today, but of what you have seen before, and of what you may yet see.
Citizens, spare these humble lives. Keep us from the gallows this day, for truly, if one is guilty, all are guilty. And yet, if you are to spare one, spare all, for through us runs the common thread (no pun intended). Are we not all, each in his own way, but humble tailors: sketching, cutting, stitching? When we prick ourselves with a straight pin, do we not bleed? Do we not want what you want? A humble home, a loaf of bread, a straw mat on which to rest, $100,000 from L’Oreal Paris to start our own line and a $50,000 HP technology suite?
Despite what some here would have you to believe, our collection is not the devil’s child. We are neither coven nor cabal. We are neither more nor less than a humble community, united by common cause and unshakable mutual love and respect. If loyalty is a crime, find us guilty. Yet we have broken no laws of the state and, most significantly, we have upheld the laws of the greatest judge of all, He who sees all and who knows the purity of our hearts and the superiority of our design and sewing skills.
Or, that is, the superiority of the design and sewing skills of most of us. A few of us, anyway. Well, me and my little friend over here to my left. The rest, I’m not sure. Especially the guy to my right. I mean, if you’ve gotta off someone, I recommend him. He’s kind of a fuck up. Yeah, sure, the law doesn’t allow you to choose him, but rules are made to be broken, right, ladies and gents? Okay, okay, if you can’t take him, how about Marcel Marceau down there at the end of the line? We can carry on without him if we have to, know what I mean, ladies ‘n germs?
Friday, August 27, 2010
PR: S8E5 Brenda's Blast
Good morning gang,
Chairman Ann:
love thingy #1
thingy #2 see I can learn -- please note the correct acronym in the title of this post!!!!!
well bitter kittens episode 5 -- as Bethie predicted -- did have more drama than I could handle ... those teams reminded me of ALL those classes I had to take at GNE ... the crucial conversation, critical thinking, diversity, being on the bus, thinking outside the box, being in the house, personality testing (i.e. Myers/Briggs, etc.) ... it was all too uncomfortable for me ... there was Gretchen making lists ... oh god that is so me ... but then I thought ... "wait, I actually know my strengths and weaknesses -- I am not really all that artistically inclined, but I am organized" ... I flashed on that recent film Valentino: the Last Emperor ... Valentino does not spend his days making lists of how many zippers should be ordered for the work rooms ... I think that might fall to the business guy/boyfriend -- Giancarlo ... deeply disturbing episode
on a happier note Casanova provided so many wonderful moments (a great example of winning editing*):
shiny black turban ... so Rudi Nureyev
"I am getting fat"
* it would be most helpful for me if we could create an "editing" glossary
crone editing
whiny editing
winning editing
etc.
Valerie also had some great screen time:
does Valerie speak Spanish? ... Valerie asking Casanova "why" in Spanish
they are going "cray-cray"
GrandPa sweaters? ... where did that come from? ... I agree with Michael D ... Team Luxe should have all
gone home just because of that phrase ... what was that jacket with the evil-eye opening in the back panel?
... scary ... what was with those riding breeches/leggings that AJ sent down the runway? ... did they come
off the accessory wall or were they sewn? ... poor AJ, got thrown under the bus and out of the house
did you see Heidi smirking when Gretchen got all emotional? ... it so warmed my heart ... okay, Heidi can stay
Tim was so masterful in the green room at the end. What a speech!!!!! Hope the remaining designers took
notes and will be on their Gretchen Guard!!!
... and now to read the TLo boy's take on last night!!!
tootles,
brenda
Labels:
bitter,
brenda,
kittens,
PR,
Project Runway,
S8,
Season eight
Monday, August 23, 2010
Two new things
Thing 1: I updated the blog settings so that you get an email when there is a new posting or comment ... hmmm, I'm sure it works for posting but forgot to test comments ... let me know if you like this or if I should turn it off.
Thing 2: Let's try adding to our blog with our Project Runway comments ... good practice for your blogging skills.
PR: S8E4
I watched this episode twice ... once with Susan while rebuilding/repairing her computer and once while I was assembling my new kitchen chairs. This means I probably watched a total of one third of it ... so much for multitasking.
Kristin: totally deserved the auf ... and explain to me how an orchid is "architectural" ... what a missed opportunity. And she got the "whiney" editing.
Valerie: better than Michael C ... was channeling Jeffery Sabelia (?) with the zippers ... nice counter to mask/hat.
April: what was she thinking ... she should have listened to Tim! And that back zipper in the diaper ... beyond bizarre.
Gretchen: I can't remember what she did.
Peach: I can't believe I'm going to say this: Peach needs to work with Michael C on choosing fabrics.
Christopher: his dress/coat was a great match to the hat ... the judges were all wrong ... maybe a little editing with the belt and skirt but not a bottom 3 piece.
Michael C: he makes Casanova look good ... predicted bottom 3 ... the judges were all wrong ... but I did love the fabric.
Casanova: what is with that Boy Scout shirt?
Ivy: her self affirmations didn't help ... boring
Mondo: I always choose big polka dots for my butt
Michael D: should have won! His outfit was perfect for that lima bean hat.
Thing 2: Let's try adding to our blog with our Project Runway comments ... good practice for your blogging skills.
PR: S8E4
I watched this episode twice ... once with Susan while rebuilding/repairing her computer and once while I was assembling my new kitchen chairs. This means I probably watched a total of one third of it ... so much for multitasking.
Kristin: totally deserved the auf ... and explain to me how an orchid is "architectural" ... what a missed opportunity. And she got the "whiney" editing.
Valerie: better than Michael C ... was channeling Jeffery Sabelia (?) with the zippers ... nice counter to mask/hat.
April: what was she thinking ... she should have listened to Tim! And that back zipper in the diaper ... beyond bizarre.
Gretchen: I can't remember what she did.
Peach: I can't believe I'm going to say this: Peach needs to work with Michael C on choosing fabrics.
Christopher: his dress/coat was a great match to the hat ... the judges were all wrong ... maybe a little editing with the belt and skirt but not a bottom 3 piece.
Michael C: he makes Casanova look good ... predicted bottom 3 ... the judges were all wrong ... but I did love the fabric.
Casanova: what is with that Boy Scout shirt?
Ivy: her self affirmations didn't help ... boring
Mondo: I always choose big polka dots for my butt
Michael D: should have won! His outfit was perfect for that lima bean hat.
Saturday, August 14, 2010
A book Twit from Stephen Fry - August 13th 1:24am
Perhaps a good site -- Five Books -- for us book types!
Thanks to @elvis717 forhttp://fivebooks.com/archive truly wonderful site...
Every day an eminent writer, thinker, commentator, politician, academic chooses five books on their specialist subject. From Einstein to Keynes, Iraq to the Andes, Communism to Empire. Share in the knowledge and buy the books.
Saturday, July 31, 2010
July Book Selections

Think of a Numb3r by John Verdon
This is a debut thriller that has gotten quite good reviews It is a combination of hard boil novel and mental puzzle. Let's see what we think.

The back up selection is The Cookbook Collector by Allegra Goodman.
This is supposedly a modern take on Sense and Sensibility. We'll see if Brenda is offended or likes it. Set in Northern California in the 90's dot.com boom. Can Ann relate?
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Other May Book (Title Too Long To Type!)
The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society...
Our second May book (yes, I know, it’s now July but…) has been living in the shadows of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo for a bit too long, as Ann very politely reminded me today.
This is a quiet book, nearly exactly the opposite of the Stieg Larsson blockbusters. It is what we were taught in English Lit 101 was called an “epistolary novel,” meaning the story is told entirely through an exchange of letters. In theory and in general, people don’t cotton much to this format. Letters sound kind of boring and indeed I can’t imagine just how boring they might sound to people who are under 30 and rely entirely on email or tweets for their primary person-to-person communication!
In this particularly charming novel of letters set in 1946, the main character, Juliet, finds herself bored with writing successful upbeat columns about the small pleasures of living through the war in Britain and looks around for another challenge. She finds it accidentally when a book she had once owned and (presumably) donated or sold to a used book store eventually finds its way to Guernsey, a small British island that is actually closer to France than to the UK mainland. Guernsey is geographically isolated from Britain and is even more cut off after the German army invades it and occupies it throughout WWII. For the most part (with a few notable exceptions), the occupying German forces treat the residents of the island harshly and corral most of the island’s resources for their own needs. Among many other deprivations, food is severely rationed and a curfew is imposed on all island residents. Along with nearly everything else, books are in very short supply.
A small group of friends secretly plans a meal with food hidden from the Nazis and, losing track of time, begin to return to their homes after curfew. They are apprehended by German soldiers and in an effort to justify their curfew violation, one of their more creative members explains (falsely) that they belong to an innocent-sounding literary society and had lost track of time due to their stimulating conversation about books. Then, to make their story look true, they decide to continue the charade, although few of them have any real interest in reading. Over the course of the novel, the group becomes a kind of family; books are sought out, read and discussed; and they all begin to correspond with Juliet. Initially, they contact her because she lives in London and they are hopeful that she can track down books they’d like to read. Eventually, she decides their story might be a good kick-off point for her own next book and asks each of the Society’s members to write her about their literary interests and how they each fit into the overall human geography of the island.
This general outline doesn’t really give any idea why this was such an engrossing book. It charms because of the distinct personalities of the Guernsey readers; the affect the German occupation has on such an isolated, hardscrabble society; and because of the way the pseudo literary society bands together to take care of a 4-year child left behind when her mother is abruptly arrested by the occupying army and sent off to an internment camp. The stories merge when Juliet arrives in Guernsey to get more direct information for her proposed book. For a novel about the hardships of war, there is an underlying sunny-ness and camaraderie that is almost irresistible. The characters are lovable for the most part, but not all of them are painted as being equally easy to love. There are characters that are so eccentric or so bitter that it takes work to see their good points but the writer(s) take the time to create round enough personalities that we begin to like even the most difficult ones. And, from a purely historical standpoint, the book covers an extremely little-known aspect of WWII, humanizes it, and makes it come to life.
As an aside, after I read this book (fortunately, for the sake of the May’s books, the P-Town book group read it last year), I read another one recommended to me by my sister-in-law Beth, which was an interesting complement to The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society—Sarah’s Key, by Tatiana de Rosnay. It’s about a similarly little-known WWII incident, the round-up by the French police after the Germans invaded and occupied France, of 10,000 Jews. The French police were not acting on orders from the Nazis but in anticipation of maybe being asked to do so at some later point. Nearly all 10,000 were initially held in deplorable conditions in a stadium in Paris, the Val d’Hiver, and then sent by train to Auschwitz, where almost all of them died. The most horrifying aspect of this incident was that men were rounded up first, then women and children at a later date. Once the women and children were collected and imprisoned in the stadium for a few days, the women were separated from the children and sent on ahead to a Nazi work camp. The children (from babies to pre-teens) were left alone in the stadium and ultimately sent to a different part of Auschwitz, where, without any maternal care, most died almost immediately. I certainly won’t paint this as an uplifting book, but if you’re interested in learning more about another little-known Nazi atrocity, and you’ve already read The Diary of Anne Frank often enough, Sarah’s Key is another gripping story that was very hard to put down.
Signing off, your despotic-rulers’ literary correspondent,
Susan
Our second May book (yes, I know, it’s now July but…) has been living in the shadows of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo for a bit too long, as Ann very politely reminded me today.
This is a quiet book, nearly exactly the opposite of the Stieg Larsson blockbusters. It is what we were taught in English Lit 101 was called an “epistolary novel,” meaning the story is told entirely through an exchange of letters. In theory and in general, people don’t cotton much to this format. Letters sound kind of boring and indeed I can’t imagine just how boring they might sound to people who are under 30 and rely entirely on email or tweets for their primary person-to-person communication!
In this particularly charming novel of letters set in 1946, the main character, Juliet, finds herself bored with writing successful upbeat columns about the small pleasures of living through the war in Britain and looks around for another challenge. She finds it accidentally when a book she had once owned and (presumably) donated or sold to a used book store eventually finds its way to Guernsey, a small British island that is actually closer to France than to the UK mainland. Guernsey is geographically isolated from Britain and is even more cut off after the German army invades it and occupies it throughout WWII. For the most part (with a few notable exceptions), the occupying German forces treat the residents of the island harshly and corral most of the island’s resources for their own needs. Among many other deprivations, food is severely rationed and a curfew is imposed on all island residents. Along with nearly everything else, books are in very short supply.
A small group of friends secretly plans a meal with food hidden from the Nazis and, losing track of time, begin to return to their homes after curfew. They are apprehended by German soldiers and in an effort to justify their curfew violation, one of their more creative members explains (falsely) that they belong to an innocent-sounding literary society and had lost track of time due to their stimulating conversation about books. Then, to make their story look true, they decide to continue the charade, although few of them have any real interest in reading. Over the course of the novel, the group becomes a kind of family; books are sought out, read and discussed; and they all begin to correspond with Juliet. Initially, they contact her because she lives in London and they are hopeful that she can track down books they’d like to read. Eventually, she decides their story might be a good kick-off point for her own next book and asks each of the Society’s members to write her about their literary interests and how they each fit into the overall human geography of the island.
This general outline doesn’t really give any idea why this was such an engrossing book. It charms because of the distinct personalities of the Guernsey readers; the affect the German occupation has on such an isolated, hardscrabble society; and because of the way the pseudo literary society bands together to take care of a 4-year child left behind when her mother is abruptly arrested by the occupying army and sent off to an internment camp. The stories merge when Juliet arrives in Guernsey to get more direct information for her proposed book. For a novel about the hardships of war, there is an underlying sunny-ness and camaraderie that is almost irresistible. The characters are lovable for the most part, but not all of them are painted as being equally easy to love. There are characters that are so eccentric or so bitter that it takes work to see their good points but the writer(s) take the time to create round enough personalities that we begin to like even the most difficult ones. And, from a purely historical standpoint, the book covers an extremely little-known aspect of WWII, humanizes it, and makes it come to life.
As an aside, after I read this book (fortunately, for the sake of the May’s books, the P-Town book group read it last year), I read another one recommended to me by my sister-in-law Beth, which was an interesting complement to The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society—Sarah’s Key, by Tatiana de Rosnay. It’s about a similarly little-known WWII incident, the round-up by the French police after the Germans invaded and occupied France, of 10,000 Jews. The French police were not acting on orders from the Nazis but in anticipation of maybe being asked to do so at some later point. Nearly all 10,000 were initially held in deplorable conditions in a stadium in Paris, the Val d’Hiver, and then sent by train to Auschwitz, where almost all of them died. The most horrifying aspect of this incident was that men were rounded up first, then women and children at a later date. Once the women and children were collected and imprisoned in the stadium for a few days, the women were separated from the children and sent on ahead to a Nazi work camp. The children (from babies to pre-teens) were left alone in the stadium and ultimately sent to a different part of Auschwitz, where, without any maternal care, most died almost immediately. I certainly won’t paint this as an uplifting book, but if you’re interested in learning more about another little-known Nazi atrocity, and you’ve already read The Diary of Anne Frank often enough, Sarah’s Key is another gripping story that was very hard to put down.
Signing off, your despotic-rulers’ literary correspondent,
Susan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
